MOHD RAIS AKHTAR SHAHID ZAMIR AHMED vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT) — WP(C)/1019/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020852026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1587/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/1019/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

TRANSPORT MATTERS ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD RAIS AKHTAR SHAHID ZAMIR AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 1019/2026 The petitioner sought re-registration of his Royal Enfield motorcycle (originally registered in Karnataka) after relocating to Kashmir, but the Regional Transport Officer and Assistant Regional Transport Officer refused to process his application under Section 49 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Justice M. A. Chowdhary disposed of the petition at the motion stage, directing the respondent transport authorities to consider and process the petitioner's re-registration application in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act and applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/1019/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 1019/2026 The petitioner sought re-registration of his Royal Enfield motorcycle (originally registered in Karnataka) after relocating to Kashmir, but the Regional Transport Officer and Assistant Regional Transport Officer refused to process his application under Section 49 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Justice M. A. Chowdhary disposed of the petition at the motion stage, directing the respondent transport authorities to consider and process the petitioner's re-registration application in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act and applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case