SUHALE MANZOOR MIR AND OTHERS MIAN TUFAIL vs UNION OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS) AND OTHERS — WP(C)/1008/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
CNR: JKHC010020652026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1572/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/1008/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
LEASE AND GOVT. CONTRACTS ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUHALE MANZOOR MIR AND OTHERS MIAN TUFAIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS) AND OTHERS
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Jul-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 1008/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to the Union of India (Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways) returnable within four weeks. The court adjourned the case to 04.07.2026 and directed respondents to consider petitioners' objections regarding flyover construction at Parimpora & Shalteng Junctions on Srinagar Bypass (NH-44), specifically evaluating the proposal for solid earthen embankment/filled ramp type construction instead of fully stilted/pillar-based framed structure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/1008/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 1008/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to the Union of India (Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways) returnable within four weeks. The court adjourned the case to 04.07.2026 and directed respondents to consider petitioners' objections regarding flyover construction at Parimpora & Shalteng Junctions on Srinagar Bypass (NH-44), specifically evaluating the proposal for solid earthen embankment/filled ramp type construction instead of fully stilted/pillar-based framed structure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts