UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION ACHABAL (POLICE / HOME) ILYAS NAZIR LAWAY vs FAIZAN RASHID MISGER AND ANOTHER — CRM(M)/276/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528,483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010020542026
e-Filing Number
04-05-2026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/491/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/276/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS PERTAINING TO CANCELLATION OF BAIL ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION ACHABAL (POLICE / HOME) ILYAS NAZIR LAWAY
Respondent(s)
FAIZAN RASHID MISGER AND ANOTHER
RAHIL BASHIR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
Orders
Summary of CRM(M) 276/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir set aside the Special Judge's order making interim bail absolute for respondents arrested with intermediate quantity heroin under NDPS Act Sections 8/21. The court found the trial judge erred by: (1) inappropriately demanding hard copies of judgments from the prosecution when online resources are available; (2) failing to address the prosecution's argument that respondents were habitual offenders; and (3) making bail absolute solely because Supreme Court directs bail decisions within two months, without considering investigation stage or accused conduct. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of prosecution objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRM(M) 276/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir set aside the Special Judge's order making interim bail absolute for respondents arrested with intermediate quantity heroin under NDPS Act Sections 8/21. The court found the trial judge erred by: (1) inappropriately demanding hard copies of judgments from the prosecution when online resources are available; (2) failing to address the prosecution's argument that respondents were habitual offenders; and (3) making bail absolute solely because Supreme Court directs bail decisions within two months, without considering investigation stage or accused conduct. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of prosecution objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts