AZAD HUSSAIN ZARGAR ASIF AHMAD BHAT vs MOHAMMAD SALEEM BHAT — CM(M)/154/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020432026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1560/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/154/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

QUASHMENT OF ORDER ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AZAD HUSSAIN ZARGAR ASIF AHMAD BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD SALEEM BHAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CM(M)/154/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition filed by 70-year-old Azad Hussain Zargar, who was detained in civil prison for failing to deposit Rs. 8 lakh under an ex-parte decree. The petitioner challenged the decree's validity on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction and had filed a Section 47 CPC application before the trial court. The court declined to adjudicate the petition itself but directed the executing court to consider the petitioner's Section 47 application sympathetically and expeditiously, given his advanced age and imprisonment, requiring disposal within seven days if early hearing is granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CM(M)/154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CM(M)/154/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition filed by 70-year-old Azad Hussain Zargar, who was detained in civil prison for failing to deposit Rs. 8 lakh under an ex-parte decree. The petitioner challenged the decree's validity on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction and had filed a Section 47 CPC application before the trial court. The court declined to adjudicate the petition itself but directed the executing court to consider the petitioner's Section 47 application sympathetically and expeditiously, given his advanced age and imprisonment, requiring disposal within seven days if early hearing is granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case