HAFEEZ AHMAD MUGHAL MR. QAZI AYAZ, IMTEYAZ RASHID BHAT vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION HAJIN (POLICE / HOME) — CRM(M)/273/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 529. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020352026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/481/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/273/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT (UAPA) ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 529

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAFEEZ AHMAD MUGHAL MR. QAZI AYAZ, IMTEYAZ RASHID BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION HAJIN (POLICE / HOME)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM(M) 273/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition, directing the trial court to urgently decide the petitioner's bail application filed on 22.09.2025, which had remained pending without consideration. The court mandated the trial court to dispose of the bail application within one month from receiving a copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/273/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM(M) 273/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition, directing the trial court to urgently decide the petitioner's bail application filed on 22.09.2025, which had remained pending without consideration. The court mandated the trial court to dispose of the bail application within one month from receiving a copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case