GHULAM RASOOL WANI RUBIA HASSAN vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (SCHOOL EDUCATION) — CM(M)/151/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020252026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1548/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/151/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

QUASHMENT OF ORDER ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM RASOOL WANI RUBIA HASSAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (SCHOOL EDUCATION)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Summary of CM(M) No. 151/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir set aside the trial court's February 18, 2026 order, finding it misread the petitioner's application seeking permission to testify as his own witness at a later stage. The court held that Order 18 Rule 3-A CPC is discretionary, not mandatory, and requires the trial court to record reasoned findings when deciding such applications. The case was remanded to the trial court to reconsider the application afresh with proper reasoned analysis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CM(M)/151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CM(M) No. 151/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir set aside the trial court's February 18, 2026 order, finding it misread the petitioner's application seeking permission to testify as his own witness at a later stage. The court held that Order 18 Rule 3-A CPC is discretionary, not mandatory, and requires the trial court to record reasoned findings when deciding such applications. The case was remanded to the trial court to reconsider the application afresh with proper reasoned analysis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case