ALI MOHAMMAD DAR MR. S. N. RATANPURI vs NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — CM(M)/149/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020192026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1542/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/149/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

PETITION U/S 227 COI ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227
Land Acquisition Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALI MOHAMMAD DAR MR. S. N. RATANPURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Case Summary: CM(M) No. 149/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's challenge to lower court orders requiring recovery of ₹2.61 crore in excess land compensation. The court held that the petitioner received duplicate payments under a finalized 2014 land acquisition award and must refund the amount with 6% interest, applying the doctrine of unjust enrichment to prevent retention of public funds beyond lawful entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  4. 05-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  5. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CM(M)/149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CM(M) No. 149/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's challenge to lower court orders requiring recovery of ₹2.61 crore in excess land compensation. The court held that the petitioner received duplicate payments under a finalized 2014 land acquisition award and must refund the amount with 6% interest, applying the doctrine of unjust enrichment to prevent retention of public funds beyond lawful entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case