UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (PUBLIC WORKS / ROADS AND BUILDINGS) MR. ABDUL RASHID MALIK vs FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT — WP(C)/985/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: JKHC010020122026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1536/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/985/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB SERVICE WRIT PETITION – SWP ( 217 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST DECISION OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (PUBLIC WORKS / ROADS AND BUILDINGS) MR. ABDUL RASHID MALIK
-
2.THE ACCOTNTANT GENERAL JAMMU AND KASHMIR SRINAGAR
Adv. abdul rashid
-
3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS AND BUILDINGS
Adv. abdul rashid
-
4.SENIOR ACCOUNTANT OFFICER
Adv. abdul rashid
-
5.TREAURY OFFICER SUB TRESURY MATTAN
Adv. abdul rashid
Respondent(s)
-
1.FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 985/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondent Farooq Ahmad Bhat, returnable within four weeks, with the next hearing scheduled for 13.07.2026. The court partially stayed the impugned judgment to the extent it provided for payment of retiral benefits without deducting benefits under SRO 59 of 1990, while prohibiting the petitioners from making any recovery from the respondent until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/985/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 985/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondent Farooq Ahmad Bhat, returnable within four weeks, with the next hearing scheduled for 13.07.2026. The court partially stayed the impugned judgment to the extent it provided for payment of retiral benefits without deducting benefits under SRO 59 of 1990, while prohibiting the petitioners from making any recovery from the respondent until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts