IQRA SHABIR AND ANOTHER GASH ASRAR UL HAQ vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS ( POLICE / HOME) — WP(C)/979/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010020012026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1528/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/979/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IQRA SHABIR AND ANOTHER GASH ASRAR UL HAQ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS ( POLICE / HOME)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    The High Court disposed of the petition, holding that adults have the constitutional right to marry by choice without legal impediment. The court directed police authorities to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners if they formally approach them, ensuring no interference in their married life. The court declined to express any opinion on the validity of the marriage itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/979/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of the petition, holding that adults have the constitutional right to marry by choice without legal impediment. The court directed police authorities to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners if they formally approach them, ensuring no interference in their married life. The court declined to express any opinion on the validity of the marriage itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case