FAROOQ AHMAD MIR S. M. SALEEM vs HABIB UL LLAH BHAT AND OTHERS — CM(M)/147/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010019952026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1523/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/147/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

QUASHMENT OF ORDER ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAROOQ AHMAD MIR S. M. SALEEM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HABIB UL LLAH BHAT AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Summary of CM(M) 147/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed petitioner Farooq Ahmad Mir's petition challenging the interim injunction granted to respondents Habib Ul-llah Bhat and others in a suit for permanent injunction over disputed property. The Court upheld both lower courts' orders, holding that an unregistered agreement to sell can be used for the collateral purpose of establishing prima facie possession, and that at the interlocutory stage, courts need not conclusively determine title—only assess prima facie case, balance of convenience, and likelihood of irreparable injury. The Court found no patent illegality, perversity, or jurisdictional error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CM(M)/147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CM(M) 147/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed petitioner Farooq Ahmad Mir's petition challenging the interim injunction granted to respondents Habib Ul-llah Bhat and others in a suit for permanent injunction over disputed property. The Court upheld both lower courts' orders, holding that an unregistered agreement to sell can be used for the collateral purpose of establishing prima facie possession, and that at the interlocutory stage, courts need not conclusively determine title—only assess prima facie case, balance of convenience, and likelihood of irreparable injury. The Court found no patent illegality, perversity, or jurisdictional error warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case