NISAR AHMAD ITOO MR. MUBASHIR MALIK, ADNAN FAYAZ vs ABDUL RASHID BHAT — CM(M)/145/2026
Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010019782026
Filing Number
CM(M)/1513/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CM(M)/145/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
QUASHMENT OF ORDER ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL CASES (C)
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismised
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NISAR AHMAD ITOO MR. MUBASHIR MALIK, ADNAN FAYAZ
Respondent(s)
ABDUL RASHID BHAT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
Orders
Case Summary: CM(M) 145/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's plea to summon a witness after evidence closure in a ₹4,50,000 recovery suit. The court held that the trial court correctly rejected the Section 151 CPC application, as the petitioner had adequate prior opportunities to produce the witness, evidence had already closed, and permitting late witness summoning would reopen proceedings and prejudice the opposing party. The court emphasized that procedural discipline under CPC cannot be circumvented by invoking inherent powers at belated stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CM(M) 145/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's plea to summon a witness after evidence closure in a ₹4,50,000 recovery suit. The court held that the trial court correctly rejected the Section 151 CPC application, as the petitioner had adequate prior opportunities to produce the witness, evidence had already closed, and permitting late witness summoning would reopen proceedings and prejudice the opposing party. The court emphasized that procedural discipline under CPC cannot be circumvented by invoking inherent powers at belated stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts