ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR SAJAD ASHRAF AND WAQAR vs NAZIR AHMAD WAGAY AND ANOTHER — CM(M)/144/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 07th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC010019672026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CM(M)/1505/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/144/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

PETITION U/S 227 COI ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR SAJAD ASHRAF AND WAQAR

Respondent(s)

NAZIR AHMAD WAGAY AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

07-05-2026

RESERVE FOR JUDGEMENT

04-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION FRESH

07-05-2026

Revoked

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL

Case Summary: CM(M) 144/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a trial court's order directing his civil imprisonment for willfully defaulting on a Lok Adalat compromise settlement. The petitioner owed ₹3,42,000 payable in monthly installments of ₹10,000 but failed to pay consistently by the 10th of each month as agreed. The court found the trial court's April 23, 2026 detention order legal and justified, holding that the petitioner intentionally breached the binding settlement terms and cannot now escape enforcement through litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CM(M) 144/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a trial court's order directing his civil imprisonment for willfully defaulting on a Lok Adalat compromise settlement. The petitioner owed ₹3,42,000 payable in monthly installments of ₹10,000 but failed to pay consistently by the 10th of each month as agreed. The court found the trial court's April 23, 2026 detention order legal and justified, holding that the petitioner intentionally breached the binding settlement terms and cannot now escape enforcement through litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case