ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR SAJAD ASHRAF AND WAQAR vs NAZIR AHMAD WAGAY AND ANOTHER — CM(M)/144/2026

Case under Article 227-Section 104 Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010019672026

Filing Number

CM(M)/1505/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CM(M)/144/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

PETITION U/S 227 COI ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismised

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 227-Section 104 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHFAQ AHMAD MIR SAJAD ASHRAF AND WAQAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAZIR AHMAD WAGAY AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Case Summary: CM(M) 144/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a trial court's order directing his civil imprisonment for willfully defaulting on a Lok Adalat compromise settlement. The petitioner owed ₹3,42,000 payable in monthly installments of ₹10,000 but failed to pay consistently by the 10th of each month as agreed. The court found the trial court's April 23, 2026 detention order legal and justified, holding that the petitioner intentionally breached the binding settlement terms and cannot now escape enforcement through litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Reserve For Judgement

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. K. Hanjura

  4. 07-May-2026

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  5. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CM(M)/144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CM(M) 144/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a trial court's order directing his civil imprisonment for willfully defaulting on a Lok Adalat compromise settlement. The petitioner owed ₹3,42,000 payable in monthly installments of ₹10,000 but failed to pay consistently by the 10th of each month as agreed. The court found the trial court's April 23, 2026 detention order legal and justified, holding that the petitioner intentionally breached the binding settlement terms and cannot now escape enforcement through litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case