MANZOOR AHMAD BHAT MR. UMMER FAROOQ, AZHAR MAQSOOD vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (FINANCE) — WP(C)/940/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010019192026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1466/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/940/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB OWP ( 215 )
Sub-Category
GST MATTERS. ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismised
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANZOOR AHMAD BHAT MR. UMMER FAROOQ, AZHAR MAQSOOD
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (FINANCE)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 940/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Manzoor Ahmad Bhat's petition challenging the rejection of his GST appeal as time-barred. The court held that appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act must be filed within four months of order communication, and the petitioner's 317-day delay could not be condoned. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that his father's medical illness and lack of formal order intimation constituted "exceptional circumstances," finding the medical records contradicted his assertions and that the ailment was insufficient to completely disable him from filing timely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Admission Fresh
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/940/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 940/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed Manzoor Ahmad Bhat's petition challenging the rejection of his GST appeal as time-barred. The court held that appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act must be filed within four months of order communication, and the petitioner's 317-day delay could not be condoned. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that his father's medical illness and lack of formal order intimation constituted "exceptional circumstances," finding the medical records contradicted his assertions and that the ailment was insufficient to completely disable him from filing timely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts