WASEEM AHMAD MIR AND OTHERS MR. ISHTIYAQ MIR vs AKSA RASHID — CRM(M)/250/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010018482026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/447/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/250/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT. ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off as Withdrawn

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WASEEM AHMAD MIR AND OTHERS MR. ISHTIYAQ MIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AKSA RASHID

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as premature for being filed directly before the High Court without first raising objections before the competent District Mobile Magistrate. The Court allowed petitioners Nos. 2-5 to withdraw and file appropriate objections before the lower court, noting the domestic violence complaint allegations were directed only at petitioner No. 1, with liberty to raise all available objections uninfluenced by this judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as premature for being filed directly before the High Court without first raising objections before the competent District Mobile Magistrate. The Court allowed petitioners Nos. 2-5 to withdraw and file appropriate objections before the lower court, noting the domestic violence complaint allegations were directed only at petitioner No. 1, with liberty to raise all available objections uninfluenced by this judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case