M/S BHAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND OTHERS M. A. PEERZADA AND ASSOC vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD TH.ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS — WP(C)/891/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION on 06th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC010018332026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C)/1392/2026

Filing Date

24-04-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/891/2026

Registration Date

24-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Coram

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Bench Type

DIVISION BENCH

Category

DB OWP ( 215 )

Sub-Category

SARFAESI ACT CASES ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226
Sarfaesi Act, 2002 Section 13

Petitioner(s)

M/S BHAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND OTHERS M. A. PEERZADA AND ASSOC

Respondent(s)

JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD TH.ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

28-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION FRESH

06-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION FRESH

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Case Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Bhat Construction Company against J&K Bank Ltd for non-prosecution. The petitioners failed to appear on consecutive hearing dates, demonstrating abandonment of the case. The court found no representation from the petitioners' side and concluded they had lost interest in pursuing the petition, warranting its dismissal under non-prosecution rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Bhat Construction Company against J&K Bank Ltd for non-prosecution. The petitioners failed to appear on consecutive hearing dates, demonstrating abandonment of the case. The court found no representation from the petitioners' side and concluded they had lost interest in pursuing the petition, warranting its dismissal under non-prosecution rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case