UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME / POLICE) MR. MOHSIN S. QADRI, MAHA MAJEED vs TAWSEEF AHMED WANI AND OTHERS — WP(C)/854/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010017502026
e-Filing Number
20-04-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1327/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/854/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB SERVICE WRIT PETITION – SWP ( 217 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST DECISION OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME / POLICE) MR. MOHSIN S. QADRI, MAHA MAJEED
-
2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE JAMMU SRINAGAR
Adv. mohsin qadri
-
3.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ARMED JAMMU/SRINAGAR
Adv. mohsin qadri
-
4.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,INDIAN RESERVE POLICE KASHMIR RANGE
Adv. mohsin qadri
-
5.COMMANDMENT INDIAN RESERVE POLICE 8TH BATTALLIAN MANASBAL GANDERBAL
Adv. mohsin qadri
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAWSEEF AHMED WANI AND OTHERS
-
2.FAYAZ AHMED BHAT S/O ABDUL RASHID BHAT
-
3.MUMTAZ AHMED LONE S/O SIKANDER LONE
-
4.MOHAMMAD AYOUB DAR S/OABDUL REHMAN DAR
-
5.MUSHTAQ AHMED S/O MOHAMMAD SHRIEF
-
6.MOHAMMAD IQBAL CHECK S/O ABDUL RASHID CHECK
-
7.AZAD UL HASSAN KUMAR S/O GHULAM HASSAN KUMAR
-
8.REYAZ AHMAD KHAN S/O SHER AHMED KHAN
-
9.TOSIEF AHMED KHAN S/O MOHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN
-
10.SHABIR AHMED DEADED S/O TAJ DIN DEADED
-
11.ABDUL HAMID BHAT S/O MOHAMMAD YOUSF BHAT
-
12.JAMSHEED AHMED WANI S/O BASHIR AHMED WANI
-
13.NISAR AHMED LONE S/O GHULAM MOHAMMAD LONE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 854/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Union Territory's petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order that favored police constable respondents. The Court found the case identical to its earlier judgment in Imtiyaz Ahmad Laloo and directed that respondents be deemed appointed prior to 01.01.2010, entitling them to Old Pension Scheme benefits. The government was ordered to comply within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Admission Fresh
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/854/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 854/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Union Territory's petition challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order that favored police constable respondents. The Court found the case identical to its earlier judgment in Imtiyaz Ahmad Laloo and directed that respondents be deemed appointed prior to 01.01.2010, entitling them to Old Pension Scheme benefits. The government was ordered to comply within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts