UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SHOPIAN (POLICE / HOME) MR. BIKRAMDEEP SINGH vs ABDUL RASHID LONE — CRM(M)/228/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528,483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010017112026
e-Filing Number
18-04-2026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/410/2026
Filing Date
20-04-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/228/2026
Registration Date
20-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )
Sub-Category
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES (NDPS) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SHOPIAN (POLICE / HOME) MR. BIKRAMDEEP SINGH
Respondent(s)
ABDUL RASHID LONE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
| 29-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH |
Orders
Summary of CRM(M) No. 228/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Union Territory's petition seeking cancellation of interim bail granted to accused Abdul Rashid Lone in an NDPS case involving 702 grams of heroin. The court found that the lower court had been routinely extending interim bail since 2024 without final disposal and directed the lower court to decide the bail application finally after hearing both parties, rather than continuing extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRM(M) No. 228/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the Union Territory's petition seeking cancellation of interim bail granted to accused Abdul Rashid Lone in an NDPS case involving 702 grams of heroin. The court found that the lower court had been routinely extending interim bail since 2024 without final disposal and directed the lower court to decide the bail application finally after hearing both parties, rather than continuing extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts