UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANOTHER (POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED) MR. ABDUL RASHID MALIK vs M/S GULATI METALS AND ALLOYS AND ANOTHER — RP/12/2026

Case under The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 114. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.

CNR: JKHC010015112026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

04-04-2026

Filing Number

RP/1166/2026

Filing Date

13-04-2026

Registration No

RP/12/2026

Registration Date

13-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA

Coram

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA

Bench Type

DIVISION BENCH

Category

DB REVIEW PETITION RP ( 218 )

Sub-Category

IN CIVIL. ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Decision Date

05th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 114

Petitioner(s)

UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANOTHER (POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED) MR. ABDUL RASHID MALIK

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TRANSMISSION LINE MINTENANCE DVISION IV

Adv. abdul rashid

Respondent(s)

M/S GULATI METALS AND ALLOYS AND ANOTHER

CHARMAN MICO AND SMALL ENTRPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL

Orders

05-06-2026
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA

Case Summary: RP No. 12/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir modified its prior order dated 19.12.2025, which had upheld the Commercial Court's rejection of the UT of J&K's Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act on jurisdictional grounds. The court corrected this error by directing the Commercial Court to return the petition to a court of competent jurisdiction, following the procedure under Order 7 Rule 10 of the CPC. The court also condoned the 82-day delay in filing the review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RP No. 12/2026 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir modified its prior order dated 19.12.2025, which had upheld the Commercial Court's rejection of the UT of J&K's Section 34 petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act on jurisdictional grounds. The court corrected this error by directing the Commercial Court to return the petition to a court of competent jurisdiction, following the procedure under Order 7 Rule 10 of the CPC. The court also condoned the 82-day delay in filing the review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case