NARGEES JAVAID MUDASIR BIN HASSAN vs GHULAM JEELANI NENGROO — CRM(M)/185/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010015062026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/344/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/185/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARGEES JAVAID MUDASIR BIN HASSAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM JEELANI NENGROO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed an interim compensation order issued under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the trial court failed to apply judicial reasoning and mechanically granted 10% interim compensation without evaluating the petitioner's prima facie defense of denying cheque signatures. The court held that Section 143-A grants discretionary power requiring recorded reasons, prima facie case evaluation, and consideration of the accused's defenses before awarding compensation, which was entirely absent in the impugned order. The magistrate was directed to pass a fresh order with proper reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed an interim compensation order issued under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding the trial court failed to apply judicial reasoning and mechanically granted 10% interim compensation without evaluating the petitioner's prima facie defense of denying cheque signatures. The court held that Section 143-A grants discretionary power requiring recorded reasons, prima facie case evaluation, and consideration of the accused's defenses before awarding compensation, which was entirely absent in the impugned order. The magistrate was directed to pass a fresh order with proper reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case