MEHRAJ UDDIN SHEIKH AND OTHERS M ANIS UL ISLAM, M MOOMIN KHAN, SAMEER H DAR, AADIL MUSHTAQ, SHAHNAZA AKHTER vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SOPORE AND ANOTHER (POLICE / HOME) — CRM(M)/183/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off as Withdrawn on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010015022026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/342/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/183/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF PROCESS/PROCEEDING. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off as Withdrawn

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEHRAJ UDDIN SHEIKH AND OTHERS M ANIS UL ISLAM, M MOOMIN KHAN, SAMEER H DAR, AADIL MUSHTAQ, SHAHNAZA AKHTER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SOPORE AND ANOTHER (POLICE / HOME)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw it upon being confronted with its maintainability issues. The court clarified that this dismissal does not prevent petitioners from pursuing their FIR challenge in the pending CRM(M) No. 86/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw it upon being confronted with its maintainability issues. The court clarified that this dismissal does not prevent petitioners from pursuing their FIR challenge in the pending CRM(M) No. 86/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case