SHOWKAT AHMAD WAR AND OTHERS M/S bHAT FAYAZ AND NIGHAT AMIN vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE DEPARTMENT) — WP(C)/751/2026

Case under Jk Csr, Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

Next hearing 30-May-2026

CNR: JKHC010014932026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1154/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/751/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Registrar Judicial

Coram

Registrar Judicial

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )

Sub-Category

OTHER MATTERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Jk Csr, Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOWKAT AHMAD WAR AND OTHERS M/S bHAT FAYAZ AND NIGHAT AMIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE DEPARTMENT)

Case History

  1. 30-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-May-2026

    For Taking Steps

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents in a writ petition challenging the rejection of petitioners' regularization claim and their subsequent disengagement order dated March 31, 2026. The Court found that the disengagement exceeded the scope of a prior Division Bench judgment which only directed consideration of regularization. The disengagement order is kept in abeyance and petitioners are permitted to continue performing duties pending final hearing scheduled for May 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/751/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir issued notice to respondents in a writ petition challenging the rejection of petitioners' regularization claim and their subsequent disengagement order dated March 31, 2026. The Court found that the disengagement exceeded the scope of a prior Division Bench judgment which only directed consideration of regularization. The disengagement order is kept in abeyance and petitioners are permitted to continue performing duties pending final hearing scheduled for May 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case