SAIMA HAMEED AND ANOTHER MR. R. A. DAR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME / POLICE) — WP(C)/744/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010014852026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1146/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/744/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIMA HAMEED AND ANOTHER MR. R. A. DAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME / POLICE)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the writ petition, affirming that adult individuals have the right to marry by choice without legal impediment. While the court acknowledged the petitioners' right to marry and the police's duty to protect them, it directed police to provide adequate security and prevent interference in their married life only if the petitioners formally approach them with their grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/744/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the writ petition, affirming that adult individuals have the right to marry by choice without legal impediment. While the court acknowledged the petitioners' right to marry and the police's duty to protect them, it directed police to provide adequate security and prevent interference in their married life only if the petitioners formally approach them with their grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case