MAROOFA JAN AND ANOTHER TALIB HUSSAIN AND ASSOC vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.D.G. OF POLICE SRINAGAR AND OTHERS — WP(C)/731/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: JKHC010014572026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1127/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/731/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAROOFA JAN AND ANOTHER TALIB HUSSAIN AND ASSOC
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.D.G. OF POLICE SRINAGAR AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition filed by Maroofa Jan and another against the Union Territory of J&K Police Srinagar for non-prosecution. The court found that petitioners had failed to appear for the last two hearings and showed no interest in prosecuting the case, warranting dismissal under procedural law with all interim directions vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
For Admission Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
For Admission Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/731/2026
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition filed by Maroofa Jan and another against the Union Territory of J&K Police Srinagar for non-prosecution. The court found that petitioners had failed to appear for the last two hearings and showed no interest in prosecuting the case, warranting dismissal under procedural law with all interim directions vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts