SHEIKH SHABIR AHMAD AND OTHERS SYED ABID PARVAZ AND ASSOC vs GHULAM MOHAMMAD DAR — FAO/8/2026

Case under The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 43R1. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC010012792026

Filing Number

FAO/989/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

FAO/8/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB 1ST MISC APPEAL ( 105 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL MISC. APPEALS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL CASES (C)

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 43R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEIKH SHABIR AHMAD AND OTHERS SYED ABID PARVAZ AND ASSOC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHULAM MOHAMMAD DAR

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO 8/2026 Outcome: The High Court modified its previous stay order dated 03.04.2026. Appellants (tenants of 17 shops) must deposit occupation charges at Rs. 3,000 per shop monthly with the trial court in an interest-bearing account. The court held that tenants cannot enjoy possession without paying charges, though the exact rate and entitlement will be determined by the main appeal. Case adjourned to 15.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul BhartiView PDF

  7. 03-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO 8/2026 Outcome: The High Court modified its previous stay order dated 03.04.2026. Appellants (tenants of 17 shops) must deposit occupation charges at Rs. 3,000 per shop monthly with the trial court in an interest-bearing account. The court held that tenants cannot enjoy possession without paying charges, though the exact rate and entitlement will be determined by the main appeal. Case adjourned to 15.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case