AMIT BAKSHI M/S AZHAR vs UNION OF INDIA TH.SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS — WP(C)/599/2026
Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off as Withdrawn on 03rd April 2026.
CNR: JKHC010011792026
Filing Number
WP(C)/909/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/599/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB OWP ( 215 )
Sub-Category
GST MATTERS. ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off as Withdrawn
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT BAKSHI M/S AZHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA TH.SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Srinagar dismissed the writ petition filed by Amit Bakshi against the Union of India as withdrawn on 03.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to refile the petition before the appropriate wing of the court, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
For Admission Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
For Admission Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma,hon'ble Mr. Justice Shahzad AzeemView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/599/2026
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Srinagar dismissed the writ petition filed by Amit Bakshi against the Union of India as withdrawn on 03.04.2026. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to refile the petition before the appropriate wing of the court, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts