AUBAID AHMAD DAR AND ANOTHER BASIT ALI DAR vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH. D.G. POLICE AND OTHERS — WP(C)/594/2026

Case under Article 226-Section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JKHC010011682026

Filing Number

WP(C)/903/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/594/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 101 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS SEEKING PROTECTION ORDERS ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AUBAID AHMAD DAR AND ANOTHER BASIT ALI DAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH. D.G. POLICE AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq NargalView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition, affirming that adult individuals have the right to marry of their own choice without legal impediment, and directing police to provide adequate security if the petitioners approach them. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the marriage's validity but instructed officials to prevent interference in the couple's married life. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf WaniView PDF

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of the petition, affirming that adult individuals have the right to marry of their own choice without legal impediment, and directing police to provide adequate security if the petitioners approach them. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the marriage's validity but instructed officials to prevent interference in the couple's married life. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case