NOORUDDIN KHATANA AND ANR M/S SHEUIKH UMAR FAROOQ AND ASSOCIATES vs CHAIRMAN (JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD) AND ORS — WP(C) /519/2025
Case under Article 226-section103 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION on 01st April 2026.
CNR: JKHC010010602025
Filing Number
WP(C) /823/2025
Filing Date
10-03-2025
Registration No
WP(C) /519/2025
Registration Date
10-03-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM
Bench Type
DIVISION BENCH
Category
DB OWP ( 215 )
Sub-Category
SARFAESI ACT CASES ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
OTHER WRIT PETITION (OWP)
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NOORUDDIN KHATANA AND ANR M/S SHEUIKH UMAR FAROOQ AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
CHAIRMAN (JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD) AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM
FOR ADMISSION FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2025 | FOR ADMISSION FRESH | |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH | |
| 09-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH | |
| 18-11-2025 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH | |
| 29-10-2025 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
Orders
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition filed by Nooruddin Khatana and another against the Chairman of Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd for want of prosecution. The petitioners failed to appear at successive hearings, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter, leading the court to vacate any interim directions and dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition filed by Nooruddin Khatana and another against the Chairman of Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd for want of prosecution. The petitioners failed to appear at successive hearings, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter, leading the court to vacate any interim directions and dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts