UMAR NAZIR BHAT M/S M. ASHRAF WANI AND ASSOCAITE vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) — WP(Crl)/95/2023
Case under Public Safety Act Section 12. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010010082023
Filing Number
WP(Crl)/251/2023
Filing Date
13-Mar-2023
Registration No
WP(Crl)/95/2023
Registration Date
13-Mar-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ( 107 )
Sub-Category
PRE EXECUTION ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
HABEUS CORPUS PETITION (HCP)
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMAR NAZIR BHAT M/S M. ASHRAF WANI AND ASSOCAITE
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SRINAGAR
-
3.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SRINAGAR
-
4.SHO (Station House Officer) POLICE STATION MAISUMA
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
Case Summary: WP(Crl) 95/2023 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED - Detention Order QUASHED The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed the preventive detention order (dated 08.04.2022) issued against Umar Nazir Bhat under the J&K Public Safety Act. The Court found the detention order unsustainable because: (1) all 23 FIRs relied upon were from 2009-2015 with no evidence of prejudicial activity after 2015, creating a 7-year gap lacking "live and proximate link"; (2) the order remained unexecuted for nearly one year despite the petitioner's availability, demonstrating absence of genuine urgency; and (3) the dossier appeared prepared mechanically only after the petitioner sought anticipatory bail, suggesting the detention was meant to obstruct bail rather than prevent genuine threats to public order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
23-Mar-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti
-
02-Mar-2026
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
29-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
04-Dec-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
13-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
18-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
25-Aug-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
15-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay DharView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
02-Jul-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
31-May-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
14-May-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Sekhri
-
24-Mar-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
14-Mar-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
01-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji KoulView PDF
-
01-Mar-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
12-Feb-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatterji Koul
-
23-Dec-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
25-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal WaniView PDF
-
25-Nov-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
08-Nov-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani
-
21-Oct-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
07-Oct-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
27-Sep-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
13-Sep-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
23-Aug-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
29-Jul-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
10-Jul-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar
-
05-Jun-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
17-May-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
29-Apr-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. K. Hanjura
-
29-Apr-2024
Revoked
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
31-Jan-2024
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
06-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
06-Dec-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
15-Nov-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
13-Oct-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
08-Sep-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
14-Aug-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Puneet Gupta
-
14-Jul-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
-
07-Jun-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar
-
15-May-2023
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
28-Apr-2023
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary
-
04-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. ChowdharyView PDF
-
04-Apr-2023
For Admission Non Fresh
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu Sharma
-
15-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sindhu SharmaView PDF
-
15-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP(Crl)/95/2023
Case Summary: WP(Crl) 95/2023 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED - Detention Order QUASHED The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir quashed the preventive detention order (dated 08.04.2022) issued against Umar Nazir Bhat under the J&K Public Safety Act. The Court found the detention order unsustainable because: (1) all 23 FIRs relied upon were from 2009-2015 with no evidence of prejudicial activity after 2015, creating a 7-year gap lacking "live and proximate link"; (2) the order remained unexecuted for nearly one year despite the petitioner's availability, demonstrating absence of genuine urgency; and (3) the dossier appeared prepared mechanically only after the petitioner sought anticipatory bail, suggesting the detention was meant to obstruct bail rather than prevent genuine threats to public order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts