UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION CHARARISHARIEF (POLICE / HOME) MR. MOHSIN S. QADRI, MAHA MAJEED vs UMAR AHAD NENGROO — CrlA(D)/11/2026

Case under National Investigation Agency Act Section 21. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th June 2026.

CNR: JKHC010007192026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

CrlA(D)/143/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

CrlA(D)/11/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Bench Type

DIVISION BENCH

Category

DB MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL PETITIONS – CRMP ( 222 )

Sub-Category

NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Decision Date

04th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

National Investigation Agency Act Section 21
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION CHARARISHARIEF (POLICE / HOME) MR. MOHSIN S. QADRI, MAHA MAJEED

Respondent(s)

UMAR AHAD NENGROO

Orders

27-02-2026
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM
03-06-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir adjournment order dated June 3, 2026, in the criminal appeal filed by the Union Territory (Police Station Chararisharief) against respondent Umar Ahad Nengroo provides no substantive decision. The court merely adjourned the hearing at the request of the appellant's counsel, with the case listed for hearing the next day (June 4, 2026). No merits of the case were addressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir adjournment order dated June 3, 2026, in the criminal appeal filed by the Union Territory (Police Station Chararisharief) against respondent Umar Ahad Nengroo provides no substantive decision. The court merely adjourned the hearing at the request of the appellant's counsel, with the case listed for hearing the next day (June 4, 2026). No merits of the case were addressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

National Investigation Agency Act Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case