UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH TH ITS ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY GENERAL AND ORS TAHIR MAJID SHAMSI vs BATOOL BANO — WP(C) /323/2025

Case under Article 226-section103 Section 226. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

CNR: JKHC010006712025

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

Filing Number

WP(C) /523/2025

Filing Date

18-02-2025

Registration No

WP(C) /323/2025

Registration Date

18-02-2025

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Bench Type

DIVISION BENCH

Category

DB SERVICE WRIT PETITION – SWP ( 217 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST DECISION OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)

Acts & Sections

Article 226-Section103 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH TH ITS ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY GENERAL AND ORS TAHIR MAJID SHAMSI

Respondent(s)

BATOOL BANO

Adv. M/S M Y BHAT, MR. HAMZA PRINCE,MS. URBA NASEER 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

21-02-2025

FOR ADMISSION FRESH

18-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH

27-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH

01-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH

25-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM

The case WP(C) 323/2025 between Union Territory of Ladakh and Batool Bano has been adjourned for consideration on 27th April 2026. The court directed that the case record be kept available before the bench on the next hearing date, and any interim directions subsisting as of the current date shall remain in operation until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case WP(C) 323/2025 between Union Territory of Ladakh and Batool Bano has been adjourned for consideration on 27th April 2026. The court directed that the case record be kept available before the bench on the next hearing date, and any interim directions subsisting as of the current date shall remain in operation until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case