ABDUL RASHID MIR MR. ASIF AHMAD BHAT vs MAQSOOD HUSSAIN WANI — CRM(M)/34/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jul-2026

CNR: JKHC010003252026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/62/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/34/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Bench Type

SINGLE BENCH

Category

SB MISC CRIMINAL CASES ( 112 )

Sub-Category

138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL CASES (Cr)

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL RASHID MIR MR. ASIF AHMAD BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAQSOOD HUSSAIN WANI

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jul-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.A. Chowdhary

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PariharView PDF

    The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir (Srinagar) adjourned the matter to 04.05.2026 due to non-appearance of petitioner Abdul Rashid Mir. The respondent's counsel was granted two weeks to file response, and the Trial Court record was summoned to be made part of the digitized record for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    For Admission Non Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf Wani

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohd Yousuf WaniView PDF

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    For Admission Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir (Srinagar) adjourned the matter to 04.05.2026 due to non-appearance of petitioner Abdul Rashid Mir. The respondent's counsel was granted two weeks to file response, and the Trial Court record was summoned to be made part of the digitized record for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case