MANISH KUMAR BHARTI M/S A. M. DAR AND ASSO vs UNION OF INDIA (HOME AFFAIRS Central Government) AND OTHERS — RP/1/2021
Case under The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 97. Disposed: Contested--Dismised on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JKHC010000842021
Filing Number
RP/67/2021
Filing Date
13-01-2021
Registration No
RP/1/2021
Registration Date
13-01-2021
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
SB SERVICE WRIT PETITIONS ( 100 )
Sub-Category
SENIORITY. ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
SERVICE WRIT PETITION (SWP)
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismised
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANISH KUMAR BHARTI M/S A. M. DAR AND ASSO
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA (HOME AFFAIRS Central Government) AND OTHERS
DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF (PERSONNEL) CRPF
MANISH YADAV, 2 IC CRPF
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 02-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 23-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 29-10-2025 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
| 15-09-2025 | FOR ADMISSION NON FRESH |
Orders
Case Summary: RP/1/2021 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the review petition filed by Manish Kumar Bharti challenging his seniority placement in CRPF. The court upheld the original dismissal on grounds of delay and laches, finding that Bharti was aware of his seniority position since 2002 but delayed filing the writ petition until 2017—15 years later. The court held that merely filing repeated representations does not cure delay or create a fresh cause of action, and that crystallized inter se seniority rights of senior officers cannot be reopened after such prolonged inaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RP/1/2021 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the review petition filed by Manish Kumar Bharti challenging his seniority placement in CRPF. The court upheld the original dismissal on grounds of delay and laches, finding that Bharti was aware of his seniority position since 2002 but delayed filing the writ petition until 2017—15 years later. The court held that merely filing repeated representations does not cure delay or create a fresh cause of action, and that crystallized inter se seniority rights of senior officers cannot be reopened after such prolonged inaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts