TARUN KUMAR GOPE vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY — JHHC10454472025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010454472025

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./30019/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARUN KUMAR GOPE

    Adv. SWETA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY

  2. 2.HARADHAN GOPE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary In Criminal Revision (Filing) No. 30019 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected Tarun Kumar Gope's interlocutory application seeking exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay found that the petitioner's arguments touched only on case merits without presenting any exceptional circumstances warranting exemption. The application (I.A. No. 2858 of 2026) was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Criminal Revision (Filing) No. 30019 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand rejected Tarun Kumar Gope's interlocutory application seeking exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay found that the petitioner's arguments touched only on case merits without presenting any exceptional circumstances warranting exemption. The application (I.A. No. 2858 of 2026) was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case