ANIL MURMU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — Cr.A(DB)/409/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302/34,IPC,3/4,PWDP,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010453682025
Filing Number
Cr.A(DB)/29953/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
Cr.A(DB)/409/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Prevention of Witch(DAAIN) Practices Act ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIL MURMU
Adv. AMAN SHEKHAR,SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR CHOUDHARY,SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR CHOUDHARY, ,KABISHA GOENKA,ASHISH KR. THAKUR,SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR CHOUDHARY
-
2.MAKU HANSDA ALIAS PAKU HANSDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand admitted the criminal appeal filed by appellants Anil Murmu and Maku Hansda against the State of Jharkhand. The court condoned a 110-day delay in filing the appeal after being satisfied with the reasons provided. Trial court records have been called for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Feb-2026
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/409/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand admitted the criminal appeal filed by appellants Anil Murmu and Maku Hansda against the State of Jharkhand. The court condoned a 110-day delay in filing the appeal after being satisfied with the reasons provided. Trial court records have been called for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts