ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHAT KUMAR — WPC/7460/2023

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010453162023

Filing Number

WPC/12157/2023

Filing Date

22-Dec-2023

Registration No

WPC/7460/2023

Registration Date

24-Dec-2023

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA

    Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR,NITESHWARI KUMARI,NITESHWARI KUMARI, ,NITESHWARI KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABHAT KUMAR

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING GOVT OF JHARKHAND

  3. 3.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD HARMU

  4. 4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JAMSHEDPUR AREA JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD

  5. 5.MANI KANT MISHRA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/7460/2023 The writ petition filed by Ashok Kumar Mishra against the State of Jharkhand was found defective and remains pending. The court granted the petitioner one week to cure the defects, failing which the petition shall be dismissed without further notice. Additionally, the court directed the Registrar General to initiate an enquiry into why the case lay dormant for 27 months without progress and take disciplinary action against erring officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Feb-2024

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 22-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/7460/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/7460/2023 The writ petition filed by Ashok Kumar Mishra against the State of Jharkhand was found defective and remains pending. The court granted the petitioner one week to cure the defects, failing which the petition shall be dismissed without further notice. Additionally, the court directed the Registrar General to initiate an enquiry into why the case lay dormant for 27 months without progress and take disciplinary action against erring officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case