ADARSH KRISHNA SAHAY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA — Cr.M.P./4724/2022

Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 323,498A,504,34,IPC,3,4,DP,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: JHHC010450632022

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./34909/2022

Filing Date

21-12-2022

Registration No

Cr.M.P./4724/2022

Registration Date

25-12-2022

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 323,498A,504,34,IPC,3,4,DP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

ADARSH KRISHNA SAHAY

Adv. ANUSHKA SHARMA,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR, ,JAZEB IQBAL,NAVEEN KUMAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VINEET KUMAR VASHISTHA

ANURADHA SAHAY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

24-01-2023

LAWAZIMA

Orders

27-08-2025
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
13-10-2025
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
07-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition, finding that notice to opposite party no. 2 was not validly served. The court directed the petitioner to file requisites for fresh notice service within four weeks (via speed post and court process), with the petition to be dismissed if this is not completed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be relisted upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition, finding that notice to opposite party no. 2 was not validly served. The court directed the petitioner to file requisites for fresh notice service within four weeks (via speed post and court process), with the petition to be dismissed if this is not completed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be relisted upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case