X vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA — A.B.A./2028/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 3(x),3(xi),SC/ST,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010450602025
Filing Number
A.B.A./29761/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
A.B.A./2028/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.X
Adv. DILIP KR KARMAKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA
-
2.VICTIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2028/2026 Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi rejected the petitioner's anticipatory bail plea in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. The court found credible allegations in the FIR that the petitioner and his mother tortured a minor informant, abused her verbally, and forced her to leave home with her child, rejecting the petitioner's claim of false allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders(with defect)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2028/2026
Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2028/2026 Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi rejected the petitioner's anticipatory bail plea in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. The court found credible allegations in the FIR that the petitioner and his mother tortured a minor informant, abused her verbally, and forced her to leave home with her child, rejecting the petitioner's claim of false allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts