ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./4729/2022

Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: JHHC010450302022

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./34882/2022

Filing Date

21-12-2022

Registration No

Cr.M.P./4729/2022

Registration Date

25-12-2022

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Order ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA

Adv. VIJAY SHANKAR PRASAD,CHETNA NANDINI,CHETNA NANDINI, ,CHETNA NANDINI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

SAWITRI DEVI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

24-01-2023

LAWAZIMA

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.4729/2022 The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the petition with directions to petitioner Ashish Kumar Gupta to cure defects identified by the stamp reporter within three weeks. The court warned that failure to rectify these defects would result in automatic dismissal of the petition without further reference to the bench. The case is to be relisted after the defects are removed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.4729/2022 The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the petition with directions to petitioner Ashish Kumar Gupta to cure defects identified by the stamp reporter within three weeks. The court warned that failure to rectify these defects would result in automatic dismissal of the petition without further reference to the bench. The case is to be relisted after the defects are removed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case