AMIT GUPTA vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT REPRESENTED BY SHRI SUDHIR LAMGOTA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (PMLA) Advocate - AMIT KUMAR DAS — Cr.M.P. /255/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 201,PART3,204,420,465,467,468,471,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 08th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010448052025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P. /29616/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P. /255/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Coram
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LOTTERY ( 148 )
Sub-Category
Prevention of Money Laundering Act. ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMIT GUPTA
Adv. ANJANI KUMAR,ASHUTOSH RANJAN KUMAR,ASHUTOSH RANJAN KUMAR, ,ASHUTOSH RANJAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT REPRESENTED BY SHRI SUDHIR LAMGOTA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (PMLA) Advocate - AMIT KUMAR DAS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
LAWAZIMA
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-01-2026 | LAWAZIMA | |
| 11-02-2026 | Fresh Filing (Admission) | |
| 08-04-2026 | Admission | |
| 01-04-2026 | Admission | |
| 25-03-2026 | Admission |
Orders
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 255 of 2026 filed by Amit Gupta against the Directorate of Enforcement (PMLA case) as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition after partial arguments, and the ED's counsel offered no opposition, leading to the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 255 of 2026 filed by Amit Gupta against the Directorate of Enforcement (PMLA case) as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition after partial arguments, and the ED's counsel offered no opposition, leading to the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts