SANJAY MUNDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI — B.A./199/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 65(2),BNS,2023,4/6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010447272025
Filing Number
B.A./29583/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
B.A./199/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY MUNDA
Adv. NANDAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Sanjay Munda's bail petition in a POCSO case involving a 6-7 year old victim, finding sufficient prosecution evidence despite the victim and informant turning hostile. The court noted corroborating witness testimony from the victim's father and others, and directed expedited trial proceedings with prompt witness production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./199/2026
The Jharkhand High Court rejected Sanjay Munda's bail petition in a POCSO case involving a 6-7 year old victim, finding sufficient prosecution evidence despite the victim and informant turning hostile. The court noted corroborating witness testimony from the victim's father and others, and directed expedited trial proceedings with prompt witness production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts