SURAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SATISH PRASAD — B.A./3833/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),96,BNS,8,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010443942025

Filing Number

B.A./29419/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

B.A./3833/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),96,BNS,8,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ KUMAR

    Adv. RISHAV KUMAR,RISHIKESH GIRI,RISHIKESH GIRI, ,RISHIKESH GIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SATISH PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to 19-year-old Suraj Kumar, who was charged with abduction and POCSO Act violations involving a 17-year-old girl from his village. The court approved bail at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, finding the case appeared to be consensual adolescent relations with a 6-day FIR delay, subject to conditions including non-interference with the victim and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3833/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to 19-year-old Suraj Kumar, who was charged with abduction and POCSO Act violations involving a 17-year-old girl from his village. The court approved bail at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, finding the case appeared to be consensual adolescent relations with a 6-day FIR delay, subject to conditions including non-interference with the victim and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case