ABHISHEK BAITHA ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR RAJAK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — Cr.Rev./313/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010443222025
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./29380/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
Cr.Rev./313/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK BAITHA ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR RAJAK
Adv. Advocate- ,KAUSHAL KISHORE TIWARI,ANJANA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Abhishek Baitha's revision petition challenging bail rejection in a rape case. The court found the serious nature of allegations sufficient to uphold the lower court's bail denial, noting the victim's statement named the petitioner as one of the accused and a Social Investigation Report indicated his association with criminal elements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
24-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.Rev./313/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Abhishek Baitha's revision petition challenging bail rejection in a rape case. The court found the serious nature of allegations sufficient to uphold the lower court's bail denial, noting the victim's statement named the petitioner as one of the accused and a Social Investigation Report indicated his association with criminal elements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts