ARJUN MUNDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR — B.A./1272/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 392,395,412,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010442522025

Filing Number

B.A./29351/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

B.A./1272/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 392,395,412,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARJUN MUNDA

    Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR,ASHISH KUMAR,ASHISH KUMAR, ,ASHISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Arjun Munda, accused in a dacoity case (IPC sections 392, 395, 412), finding merit in arguments that he was not named in the FIR, lacked criminal antecedents, and had been in custody since September 2025. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./1272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Arjun Munda, accused in a dacoity case (IPC sections 392, 395, 412), finding merit in arguments that he was not named in the FIR, lacked criminal antecedents, and had been in custody since September 2025. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on cooperation with trial, providing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case