BHUNESHWAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY — Cr.A(SJ)/33/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 25(I-A)/35,25(I-B)a/35,ARMS,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010440742025

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/29237/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/33/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 25(I-A)/35,25(I-B)a/35,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUNESHWAR MAHTO

    Adv. VIKESH KUMAR,AJIT KUMAR,AJIT KUMAR, ,AJIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary: The case was adjourned pending proper service of notice. The court found that the notice to respondent no.2 was not validly served and directed the appellant to issue fresh notice by speed post and court process within two weeks, failing which the criminal appeal shall be dismissed. The notice is made returnable within six weeks, and the case will be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case was adjourned pending proper service of notice. The court found that the notice to respondent no.2 was not validly served and directed the appellant to issue fresh notice by speed post and court process within two weeks, failing which the criminal appeal shall be dismissed. The notice is made returnable within six weeks, and the case will be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case