REKHALAL MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO — Cont.(Cvl)/139/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010439582025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/14787/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/139/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REKHALAL MAHTO

    Adv. PANKAJ SRIVASTAVA,MAMTA SINHA,MAMTA SINHA, ,ANUSHKA SWADHA,ASHISH GAUTAM,MAMTA SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO

  2. 2.DWARIKA BAITHA, THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the contempt proceeding against the District Land Acquisition Officer, finding that he had passed a reasoned order dated 11.11.2025 in compliance with the court's earlier order, thereby negating the allegation of willful disobedience. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to pursue other legal remedies against the officer's compensation rejection order if dissatisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/139/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the contempt proceeding against the District Land Acquisition Officer, finding that he had passed a reasoned order dated 11.11.2025 in compliance with the court's earlier order, thereby negating the allegation of willful disobedience. The court allowed the petitioner liberty to pursue other legal remedies against the officer's compensation rejection order if dissatisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case