THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, vs JYOTI LAL MAHTO Advocate - TEJO MISTRY, ,KRISHNA MURARI,RAJ VARDHAN,SANJAY PIPRAWALL,KRISHNA MURARI — LPA/67/2025

Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Next hearing 13-Jul-2026

CNR: JHHC010438832024

Filing Number

LPA/13893/2024

Filing Date

20-Dec-2024

Registration No

LPA/67/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Clause 10 Of Letters Patent ( 24 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT,

    Adv. ASHOK KR YADAV

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS AND RAJBHASHA DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.THE UNDER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

  4. 4.THE STATE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

  5. 5.THE JOINT TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JYOTI LAL MAHTO Advocate - TEJO MISTRY, ,KRISHNA MURARI,RAJ VARDHAN,SANJAY PIPRAWALL,KRISHNA MURARI

  2. 2.THE JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

  3. 3.THE SECRETARY, JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION

  4. 4.SRI AMOD KUMAR TRIPATHI

  5. 5.SRI ARUN KUMAR DAS

  6. 6.SRI RAJNIKANT SINGH

  7. 7.SRI ARUN KUMAR JHA

  8. 8.SRI ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

  9. 9.SRI BAHADUR PRASAD VERMA

  10. 10.SRI NARENDRA PRASAD YADAV

  11. 11.SRI RAM KRISHNA TIWARI

  12. 12.SRI ASHISH KUMAR MAHTO

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  3. 13-Jul-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    Case Summary: LPA/67/2025 (with consolidated LPA/119/2025 and LPA/140/2025) The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the State's mention of LPA/140/2025, noting the matter was already scheduled for 13 July 2026 and lacked urgency. The court directed the Secretary, Department of Transport to personally ensure compliance with the Single Judge's order without prejudice to the appeal, and prohibited adjournment applications in contempt proceedings based on appeal pendency, as the appeal itself was filed beyond the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan),HON'BLE Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  8. 08-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan),HON'BLE Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao) , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  10. 02-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice (M.s. Ramachandra Rao),hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  11. 29-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 20-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/67/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LPA/67/2025 (with consolidated LPA/119/2025 and LPA/140/2025) The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the State's mention of LPA/140/2025, noting the matter was already scheduled for 13 July 2026 and lacked urgency. The court directed the Secretary, Department of Transport to personally ensure compliance with the Single Judge's order without prejudice to the appeal, and prohibited adjournment applications in contempt proceedings based on appeal pendency, as the appeal itself was filed beyond the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case