SATENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — B.A./12029/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80(2).,61(2,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010438642025

Filing Number

B.A./29108/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

B.A./12029/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 80(2).,61(2,3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL

    Adv. JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,ANIKET JAISWAL,ANIKET JAISWAL, ,NEEHARIKA MAZUMDAR,ROHAN MAZUMDAR,ANIKET JAISWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Satendra Kumar Jaiswal, accused of dowry-related offenses and torture under BNS sections 80(2), 61(2), and 3(5). The court found that post-mortem evidence showed the deceased died from ante-mortem injuries caused by blunt force and burns within seven years of marriage, coupled with direct allegations of dowry demand and torture, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./12029/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Satendra Kumar Jaiswal, accused of dowry-related offenses and torture under BNS sections 80(2), 61(2), and 3(5). The court found that post-mortem evidence showed the deceased died from ante-mortem injuries caused by blunt force and burns within seven years of marriage, coupled with direct allegations of dowry demand and torture, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case