RANJEET SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR, ,BHASWAT PRAKASH,SUPRIYA DAYAL,ANURAG KASHYAP — Cr.A(SJ)/1082/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 352,356(2),BNS,2023,3(1)(r)(u),SC,ST,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010437542025

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/29058/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/1082/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )

Sub-Category

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 352,356(2),BNS,2023,3(1)(r)(u),SC,ST,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJEET SINGH

    Adv. RANJIT KUMAR TIWARI,RAJEEV RANJAN TIWARY,RAJEEV RANJAN TIWARY, ,RAJEEV RANJAN TIWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR, ,BHASWAT PRAKASH,SUPRIYA DAYAL,ANURAG KASHYAP

  2. 2.RADHAKRISHNA KISHOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Singh in a case involving charges under Sections 352 & 356(2) BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r)(u) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found that the FIR did not disclose commission of SC/ST Act offences, the complaint contained only political criticism via Facebook comment without caste-based language, and the victim (Finance Minister Radhakrishna Kishor) did not oppose bail, treating the case as potential misuse of protective provisions. Singh was directed to surrender within four weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  11. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  12. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  14. 18-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  16. 03-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  17. 30-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  18. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  19. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/1082/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Singh in a case involving charges under Sections 352 & 356(2) BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r)(u) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court found that the FIR did not disclose commission of SC/ST Act offences, the complaint contained only political criticism via Facebook comment without caste-based language, and the victim (Finance Minister Radhakrishna Kishor) did not oppose bail, treating the case as potential misuse of protective provisions. Singh was directed to surrender within four weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case