ANAND MARANDI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANISH KUMAR — W.P.(Cr.)/264/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010436892025
Filing Number
W.P.(Cr.)/29004/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
W.P.(Cr.)/264/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Illegal Detention ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANAND MARANDI
Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANISH KUMAR
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY , DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
-
3.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, JHARKHAND
-
4.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ( D I G ) , DUMKA REGION, DUMKA
-
5.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE , DEOGHAR
-
6.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE , PAKUR
-
7.TARUN BAKHLA,THE THEN OFFICER - IN - CHARGE, MARGOMUNDA POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Anand Marandi's writ petition seeking FIR registration and action against police officers for alleged illegal detention, custodial torture, kidnapping, and criminal intimidation. The court held that since a preliminary inquiry was already conducted, the petitioner should approach the appropriate forum for redressal rather than seek judicial intervention at the writ stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(Cr.)/264/2026
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Anand Marandi's writ petition seeking FIR registration and action against police officers for alleged illegal detention, custodial torture, kidnapping, and criminal intimidation. The court held that since a preliminary inquiry was already conducted, the petitioner should approach the appropriate forum for redressal rather than seek judicial intervention at the writ stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts