SUNIL CHOUDHARY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR, ,AISHWARYA PRAKASH,SAHAJANAND SHARMA — Cr.M.P./4555/2022
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 354,406,420,506,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010435102022
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./33829/2022
Filing Date
13-12-2022
Registration No
Cr.M.P./4555/2022
Registration Date
17-12-2022
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIL CHOUDHARY
Adv. CHANCHAL JAIN,APRAJITA BHARDWAJ,APRAJITA BHARDWAJ, ,AKRITI SHREE,SAMEER SAHAY,SAMEER RANJAN,TANYA SINGH,TEJASWITA SAFALTA,APRAJITA BHARDWAJ
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR, ,AISHWARYA PRAKASH,SAHAJANAND SHARMA
SACHINDRA PRASAD SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-01-2023 | LAWAZIMA |
| 08-10-2025 | Admission |
| 24-09-2025 | Admission |
Orders
The Jharkhand High Court quashed criminal case no. 395 of 2022 against Sunil Choudhary (Managing Director of Kashish Developers Pvt. Ltd.) under Sections 354, 406, 420, 506 IPC, finding no specific allegations against him beyond his position. The court held that none of the charged offences were substantiated even if all allegations were accepted as true, and that the case represented an abuse of process converting a civil dispute into criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Jharkhand High Court quashed criminal case no. 395 of 2022 against Sunil Choudhary (Managing Director of Kashish Developers Pvt. Ltd.) under Sections 354, 406, 420, 506 IPC, finding no specific allegations against him beyond his position. The court held that none of the charged offences were substantiated even if all allegations were accepted as true, and that the case represented an abuse of process converting a civil dispute into criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts